Architectural & Design Studio

Neighbors Left in the Dark Under New ADU Housing Law

12/27/20233 min read


Recently, a controversial California law, known as SB 9, has come under scrutiny for its impact on neighbors and communities. While the intention of the law is to increase the state's housing stock by allowing multiple residences to be built on a single-family lot, it has also inadvertently bypassed the need for community input and notification.

One such incident occurred in the Palo Verde neighborhood, where the neighbors of 883 Rorke Way were taken by surprise when they discovered that a vacant residence was being demolished and replaced with a new two-story home, garage, and accessory dwelling unit (ADU). The 7,459 square-foot lot had been granted a permit under SB 9, but the neighbors claim they were never notified about these changes.

The lack of notification has left the affected neighbors feeling frustrated and disregarded. They argue that they should have had the opportunity to voice their concerns and provide input on the development taking place in their community. The absence of community input not only undermines the sense of community but also raises questions about the transparency and fairness of the new housing law.

SB 9 was introduced in 2021 as a means to address the housing shortage in California. By allowing homeowners to add second homes and split properties, the law aimed to increase the housing stock and provide more affordable housing options. However, the unintended consequences of the law have raised concerns among residents and communities.

One of the main issues with SB 9 is the lack of notification requirements for neighbors. Under the law, homeowners can proceed with their construction plans without notifying or seeking input from their neighbors. This omission has left many feeling blindsided and excluded from decisions that directly impact their quality of life.

Proponents of SB 9 argue that the law is necessary to address the housing crisis in California and streamline the construction process. They believe that by removing the need for community input, projects can be completed more efficiently, allowing for the much-needed increase in housing supply.

However, opponents of the law argue that community input is vital for maintaining the character and integrity of neighborhoods. They believe that neighbors should have a say in the development taking place around them, as it can have a significant impact on their daily lives, including traffic, parking, and overall aesthetics.

Furthermore, the lack of notification also raises concerns about the potential for abuse. Without proper oversight and community input, there is a risk that developers could take advantage of the law to build structures that are out of place or incompatible with the existing neighborhood.

While SB 9 may have been well-intentioned, it is clear that the law needs to be reevaluated to address the concerns of neighbors and communities. Balancing the need for increased housing supply with the importance of community input is crucial for creating sustainable and harmonious neighborhoods.

One possible solution is to amend the law to include mandatory notification requirements for neighbors. By ensuring that neighbors are informed and given the opportunity to provide input, the law can strike a better balance between housing development and community cohesion.

Additionally, cities and local governments can play a role in mitigating the negative impact of SB 9 by implementing their own policies and regulations. They can require developers to engage with the community, hold public hearings, and address any concerns raised by neighbors. This approach would allow for a more inclusive and transparent decision-making process.

In conclusion, while SB 9 aims to address California's housing crisis, it has inadvertently left neighbors in the dark and bypassed community input. The lack of notification requirements undermines the sense of community and raises questions about the fairness and transparency of the law. It is essential to reevaluate and amend SB 9 to strike a better balance between housing development and community cohesion. By including mandatory notification requirements and encouraging community engagement, we can create sustainable and harmonious neighborhoods that meet the needs of all residents.




120 Newport Center Dr

Newport Beach, CA 92660